Rumors
and its impact on organization
By:
Mohamad Afifi Yahaya
According to oxford dictionary, rumors
can be seen as stories or statements in general circulation without any
confirmation or certainty as to facts. It is also can be called as gossip and
hearsay (Hawkins, 2011) .
Since people like gossiping and
interesting bits of information, rumors often grow and spread over because of people
is naturally like to be “in the know”. Most of the time, they feel it’s important
for them to know thing that most people don’t. In any organizations, this type
of interaction is dangerous and costly. It wastes time, damages reputation,
creates anxiety, and promotes divisiveness (Mind Tools, 2015) .
According to Davis (2009), in academic
line rumors are also known as grapevine. “No
administrator in his right mind would ever try to abolish the management
grapevine. It is as permanent as humanity is. It should be recognized,
analyzed, and consciously used for better communication”.
In some regard the grapevine can be
seen as an evil, a thorn in the side which regularly spreads rumor destroys
morale and reputations, leads to irresponsible actions, and challenges
authority. Sometimes, it was a good thing because it acts as a safety regulator
and carries news fast (Davis, 2009) .
Some scholars have highlighted a few
characteristics of grapevine such as humanly permanent, extremely fast, highly
accurate, qualified answer, usually bad news, and a real life example. However,
among the policy-makers especially among the government and management,
grapevine is something important for them. We can call it as “trial balloons”
via grapevine. If an institution is about to implement a new policy, but is
unsure about how people may react to it, word of the new policy can be placed
on a grapevine and employee reactions being observed. If there is little or no
negative reaction to the contemplated policy, then an official announcement of
its enactment can be made (Wells & Spinks, 1994) .
In 1953, a scholar named as Davis has
developed a theory to study grapevine in organizations. Through his theory of
Episodic Communication in Channels of Organization (ECCO) analysis, we can
trace person-to-person diffusion of rumors and the flow of other information in
an organization. By plotting over the communication network, the researcher or
investigator probably might know who starts create the rumors and how it has been
circulated through the network (Monge & Contractor, 2003) .
Reference
Davis, K. (2009). Management Communication and
Grapevine. Harvard Business Review Notice of Use Restrictions .
Hawkins, J. M.
(2011). Oxford Dictionary. Malaysia: Oxford Fajar .
Mind Tools. (2015). Rumors
in the workplace. Retrieved October 3, 2015, from Mind Tools
"excellent skills for an excellent career":
https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_25.htm
Monge, P., &
Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of Communication Network. Carlifornia:
Oxford University Press.
Wells, B., &
Spinks, N. (1994). Managing Your Grapevine: A Key to Quality Productivity. Executive
Development , 24-27.
No comments:
Post a Comment